Plurality and neo-shamanism
Oct. 30th, 2013 09:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I suppose I owe this post, considering that I wrote that ask on LivingPlural about the topic. >_>
I've drawn a lot of parallels between various modes of magic and being on here, including speaking to spirits, praying, animism, plurality/multiplicity, and neo-shamanic journeying. I admit it's a hand-waving sort of discourse, but I mostly want to point out that these things are not such vastly different exercises as people often think. They aren't the same thing (IMO), but they do share a number of traits, and there's a commonality running between them: there is one body out here, and more than one person in communication in there. This is what I call plural magic, wherever it "comes from".
I also believe that we can use these congruencies and similarities to learn from different modes of working, and that we can sometimes even pick up a new method for something that we do, which was previously applied only to another mode. For example, the same methods one might use to improve communication with a plural headmate may also be very useful when trying to increase the clarity with which one can speak to animistic spirits or deities. They're not the same thing, but they have congruencies from which we can synthesise new methods.
This, to me, is what's so exciting about the concept of this group. So! Today I wish to write about neo-shamanism and plurality cross-overs.
( More... )
And that is all, of course, a big opinion piece. :) But I hope that it's more clear why I am drawing these parallels and how they might benefit people who practise all of these various ways of communing with intelligences and spirits and Others besides themselves.
(Definitions)
I've drawn a lot of parallels between various modes of magic and being on here, including speaking to spirits, praying, animism, plurality/multiplicity, and neo-shamanic journeying. I admit it's a hand-waving sort of discourse, but I mostly want to point out that these things are not such vastly different exercises as people often think. They aren't the same thing (IMO), but they do share a number of traits, and there's a commonality running between them: there is one body out here, and more than one person in communication in there. This is what I call plural magic, wherever it "comes from".
I also believe that we can use these congruencies and similarities to learn from different modes of working, and that we can sometimes even pick up a new method for something that we do, which was previously applied only to another mode. For example, the same methods one might use to improve communication with a plural headmate may also be very useful when trying to increase the clarity with which one can speak to animistic spirits or deities. They're not the same thing, but they have congruencies from which we can synthesise new methods.
This, to me, is what's so exciting about the concept of this group. So! Today I wish to write about neo-shamanism and plurality cross-overs.
( More... )
And that is all, of course, a big opinion piece. :) But I hope that it's more clear why I am drawing these parallels and how they might benefit people who practise all of these various ways of communing with intelligences and spirits and Others besides themselves.
(Definitions)